Garmin distance accuracy reddit. 3. This subreddit is an unofficial, non-affiliated community, run by the users, to embrace and have conversation about the products we love! Welcome to our community for all things related to Garmin watches. We're talking 10-20% each day. Would the distance shown when I walk be the most accurate measurement? I'm guessing that the faster you go the wider the margin of error gets. . On average, every mile my watch/strap records is actually . Lately I’ve been running on a treadmill and have been running into the issue of my Garmin tracking faster paces and longer distances than what the treadmill and am wondering if there’s any reason my Garmin might be reporting faster paces. If Garmin does not have that then it has absolutely no frame of reference to give an accurate prediction. 27 official distance, stryd gave me 5. I used my foot pod with my Forerunner 620 and it was fairly accurate. 3 update. 7mi vs mapping these manually. They compare well to my actual times, so I know that they aren't wildly optimistic. 74km) The problem is I’m realising my pace and distance have never been accurate. The previous week was worse - we ran side by side the whole timeshe got 13. Anyway I was going to return my HRM, but suddenly there IS the option to use "speed" and "distance" from the HRM pro, which is recognised as a footpod so Garmin support were wrong about a simple feature both times. My total distance came out to be exactly 26. It is quite possible that soon to be released Forerunner 955 will have the same chip. Having come from other GPS watches I'm used to the recorded distance being "off" and adding extra distance to my runs as it bounces around in the city. I've actually run an indoor marathon 150 laps on an indoor track). How do you calibrate it? Every time I run on the treadmill, Garmin says I’m going much slower than I actually am. I run quite often in tree covered areas, and distance is always top notch. Does anyone have any insight on whether or not garmin watches track cycling distance and speed accurately? I went for a ride the other day, and the readings seemed accurate based on how far out and back I went based on the map. Forerunner 265 is my first multiband GPS watch and the accuracy is awesome. Garmin for me was off by about 3 minutes. According to DCRAINMAKER it self calibrates in the background with about 2+ hours of outdoor running. I also had to give the Garmin 10 feet to the net. I’ve tried changing the distance of the run in the Garmin app after each run but it’s barely made a difference So it turned out to be useless to match against the race predictor, because there was 1,800ft of elevation total and was all off-road with plenty of muddy tracks from 24 hours of rain (which continued throughout the race) - meaning I was a good 35mins behind my race predictor result. 95 and 5. Also, I’ve gotten the best results with the Garmin at 7’ behind the hitting area. The sub is free from influence of Garmin's marketing arm. I’ve run on hundreds of treadmills with a Stryd footpod. Garmin is not very accurate at all, there in run GPS based distance calculations does not have Geoid height calculations (and only a hand full of apps do, so most of them are inaccurate also). In that time, I’ve purchase a Garmin FR 265 and the HRM Pro-plus to get as accurate pace, distance and hr data as i can. Nobody's responded to this post yet. So if your route has any degree of hills it will be out. After 4-5 years using a fenix to track swimming, it's true that it misses a length, or counts double occasionally. I'm having a weird situation though. +/- accurate in the end Not precise, but for 1000m it's not more than 10% off usually. I noticed these providing much more accurate data than regular balls after the 4. Hi all. All the other runners had between 4. The only other watch that has the same chipset is Coros Vertix 2, but Garmin seems to have better algorithms and/or better antenna design so it is more accurate. 6-. Checked Strava on PC by 'saving' route and it was close in distance to Garmin, BUT, when I looked at my Friday '20k', I saved the route in Strava and it came out as 15. 05km on the walking pad but the watch picked up 1. Like 1:00m/km slower. 84 mi. Distance was accurate (compared with a hand mapped route) but calories was way low - 715 for a 9 mile run with close to 800 feet of elevation gain. Add your thoughts and get the conversation going. I did a later PM follow up run without strap, and I even drove my normal distances for a sanity check, and sure enough, when using strap all my recorded historical distance and pace are wack. At the end of each day, my AW is 1000 steps less and the distance on the Garmin is far higher too. On a garmin you can display any running data you want on a screen, and you can scroll through them by pressing a button. Whether you run, cycle or swim, this is the place to be. Lately I've been running with a friend and my distances is always significantly shorter than hers. My outdoor distances seem accurate enough, I have a fairly standard loop I follow and it seems to be recording fairly consistently. For me it's the opposite, I'm so happy with the distance accuracy. I just want to make sure I'm running a proper 5k, 2. 38km! (route was 2/3 country lanes, 1/3 farm tracks). I've heard GSPro is recommended but until its officially supported, its just not worth it for me to do workarounds to get it to work. By the end of our 13 mile run yesterday I had to run an additional . My 5km pb is 19:36 (done in a parkrun with the HRM on although my watch distance read 4. And I've done a 5+ minute GPS soak every time, I'm recording every second, and I have the 3D settings turned on. I'm consistently getting distances off by 3%+, which really throws off performance metrics. Just ran a race this Friday, 5. 12 mi and I got 12. All we ask is that you be fair, reasonable, don't flame anyone and don't post affiliate links. I think a big part of Garmin being accurate is tied to having accurate data for MAXHR and/or lactate threshold in the watch. Google maps measuring does take into account elevation so will be more accurate. Vivo Hi, I´m coming from a Suunto Ambit 3 Peak and recently bought Galileo, again in theory, is a more accurate system but since Garmin only does single-frequency solutions it really isn't much, and their implementation last time I looked was poor. 4k, etc. Welcome to our community for all things related to Garmin watches. The accuracy of all bar Nordictrack is horrendous. Our objective is to moderate with the lightest possible touch. 2, but I anak ran an extra lap. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Pace Accuracy on Garmin Devices . Having run all 4 distances, and seen the race predictor estimates rise and fall as I run more/less and as I gain/lose fitness, I would say pretty accurate. Also, I did ask about R10 accuracy in general the other day so I am not asking about setting up and thanks to those that responded to that post. Then I will try it on a treadmill run and see how it goes. 15 after she stopped to get the same distance as her. 6km from my arm swings. I’ve had a garmin for a few years and my running fitness is currently at its highest it’s ever been in my life and my V02 has dropped several points over the last 8 months and I consistently get -2 or -4 on my little scores during a run solely because I’m not doing the excessive amount of anaerobic work r/Garmin is the community to discuss and share everything and anything related to Garmin. Look for DCRainmaker's open water swim tests, a rather corner case, but a good window into how well Garmin is actually implementing a solution to a hard problem. I like to see pace, distance, and HR zone for most workouts. I walked 5. Personally find it not accurate. Have any previous AW users found the accuracy of the step on Garmin more or less accurate? The same with distance too. This really improved both distances with low irons and Driver as well as with hooking/slicing. I'm transitioning to treadmill running and I love it all, except the fact that my Garmin Vivosport can't accurately measure distance indoors. But you can only calibrate it to 50% less or 2x the distance recorded. 10 due to gps errors (we went through a stadium and in covered areas). Get the RCT balls. how on earth would the garmin be more accurate? how can you correlate HR to distance? It’s definitely the treadmill that you need to look at for accurate measurement of distance. I should be up to that soon. I usually estimate 100 cals/mile ran which I think is actually on the low end, so the Garmin reading is very low. This isn't a huge issue since the treadmill obviously provides a readout, but I'd like some way of getting that info into my phone for tracking purposes, without having to go back and manually edit all my runs.